| Author |
Message |
|
destinyros2005
|
|
|
Reply Quote
|
Yeah...that was pretty painful to choke out.  It would be difficult to hide her pregnancy in the line of work she's in. It's not like she's a house wife and she can hide behind a laundry basket and such, but come on...get real about it!
|
|
| TopBottom |
|
|
UMgirl
|
|
Delirious
Reply Quote
|
|
That's why she should have been in a comoa or gone missing... but then ABC seems to think everyone watches the show for the hot chick.
|
|
| TopBottom |
|
|
destinyros2005
|
|
|
Reply Quote
|
|
| TopBottom |
|
|
UMgirl
|
|
Delirious
Reply Quote
|
Yeah, that's why I watch too. 
|
|
| TopBottom |
|
|
destinyros2005
|
|
|
Reply Quote
|
I'm so glad we can agree on that! 
|
|
| TopBottom |
|
|
UMgirl
|
|
Delirious
Reply Quote
|
|
Now, we need to decide who is it?
|
|
| TopBottom |
|
|
destinyros2005
|
|
|
Reply Quote
|
|
| TopBottom |
|
|
UMgirl
|
|
Delirious
Reply Quote
|
|
LOL Yeah, since there isn't one...
|
|
| TopBottom |
|
|
destinyros2005
|
|
|
Reply Quote
|
No kidding! 
|
|
| TopBottom |
|
|
UMgirl
|
|
Delirious
Reply Quote
|
|
Now if LO was on the show...
|
|
| TopBottom |
|
|
destinyros2005
|
|
|
Reply Quote
|
Now...she's a hot chick! Anna looked pretty good too. Plus, she's evil so that gives her that bad-girl edge. 
|
|
| TopBottom |
|
|
UMgirl
|
|
Delirious
Reply Quote
|
|
Totally.
Or, that chick who plays Peyton? She's much better looking than any of the current chicks.
Anna was okay, but she scared me... I never really believed Sydney could take her on and win.
|
|
| TopBottom |
|
|
destinyros2005
|
|
|
Reply Quote
|
|
Amy Acker? Yeah, she's much better looking then the girl that plays Rachel. They should of put her in that role instead! She comes from Angel, so you know she can kick ass. Plus, if you saw what they did to her character the last season...you know she kicks ass!
|
|
| TopBottom |
|
|
UMgirl
|
|
Delirious
Reply Quote
|
|
I never watched Angel, so I have no clue, but I've heard from other people that she rocks. WHY didn't they hire her as Rachel? I could totally believe her.
Spoilers indicate that we're going to see Rachel more comfortable as an agent, are they kidding? She is NOT good. Even when she's supposed to be feeling more and more in line with being a spy, she looks/acts out of place. The actress just sucks!
|
|
| TopBottom |
|
|
destinyros2005
|
|
|
Reply Quote
|
|
More comfortable? Please...she'd have to be a completely different person for me to believe it.
Why didn't they hire Amy as Rachel? That would of been the smart thing to do and from this season, we know they aren't into doing the smart thing!
|
|
| TopBottom |
|
|
UMgirl
|
|
Delirious
Reply Quote
|
|
LOL I know. It's the ACTRESS, not the character, that we have a hard time believing. I think Rachel could have been an interesting, if not compelling character, but with RACHEL NICHOLS playing her, she comes across as so... just blah. She shows little emotion(even when she's supposed to) and her line delivery blows. Her stunts suck. She, ALONE, destroyed that fight scene with Peyton. Amy Ackers looked like she had no idea how to combat sucky fighting, so she decided to duck...
Frankly, if it was between Rachel Nichols and ... I'd have chosen ...
|
|
| TopBottom |
|
|
destinyros2005
|
|
|
Reply Quote
|
|
| TopBottom |
|
|
UMgirl
|
|
Delirious
Reply Quote
|
|
Yeah, I know.. We do a lot of that. LOL
|
|
| TopBottom |
|
|
destinyros2005
|
|
|
Reply Quote
|
;lol Funny how that works!
|
|
| TopBottom |
|
|
UMgirl
|
|
Delirious
Reply Quote
|
|
You know... Great minds and all that fun stuff.
Now, what the heck was this episode about again? Outside of like 2 episodes, I can't remember much of anything. LOL
|
|
| TopBottom |
|
